Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 16 results ...

Ali, A K (2019) A case study in developing an interdisciplinary learning experiment between architecture, building construction, and construction engineering and management education. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2040–59.

Chan, D W, Olawumi, T O and Ho, A M (2019) Critical success factors for building information modelling (BIM) implementation in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1838–54.

Chen, Y, Yin, Y, Browne, G J and Li, D (2019) Adoption of building information modeling in Chinese construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1878–98.

Gao, J, Ren, H and Cai, W (2019) Risk assessment of construction projects in China under traditional and industrial production modes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2147–68.

Iskandar, K A, Hanna, A S and Lotfallah, W (2019) Modeling the performance of healthcare construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2023–39.

Jin, R, Zou, P X, Li, B, Piroozfar, P and Painting, N (2019) Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1899–923.

Laryea, S (2019) Procurement strategy and outcomes of a new universities project in South Africa. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2060–83.

Lavikka, R H, Kyrö, R, Peltokorpi, A and Särkilahti, A (2019) Revealing change dynamics in hospital construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1946–61.

Lee, C (2019) Financing method for real estate and infrastructure development using Markowitz’s portfolio selection model and the Monte Carlo simulation. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2008–22.

Manu, P, Mahamadu, A, Booth, C, Olomolaiye, P O, Coker, A, Ibrahim, A and Lamond, J (2019) Infrastructure procurement capacity gaps in Nigeria public sector institutions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1962–85.

Marefat, A, Toosi, H and Mahmoudi Hasankhanlo, R (2019) A BIM approach for construction safety: applications, barriers and solutions. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1855–77.

Nadafi, S, Moosavirad, S H and Ariafar, S (2019) Predicting the project time and costs using EVM based on gray numbers. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2107–19.

Pantzartzis, E, Price, A and Edum Fotwe, F (2019) Roadmap layers and processes: resilient and sustainable care facilities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1986–2007.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Healthcare; Sustainability; Resilience; Process; Social care; Roadmap;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-06-2016-0136
  • Abstract:
    Health and social care facilities are usually complex buildings that require continuous effort to provide resilient and sustainable responses to changes in demographics, technologies, diseases and models of care. Despite resilience and sustainability concepts being frequently used by practitioners and researchers, ambiguities in their definitions often result in a lack of operational solutions to record, monitor and improve the resilience and sustainability of health and social care facilities. Although the importance and complexity of the issues are widely acknowledged, there is little strategic guidance as to how they should be achieved. The purpose of this paper is to assess the suitability of developing a roadmap for improving the resilience and sustainability of UK health and social care facilities, and to identify the layers and processes needed to construct such a roadmap. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative approach was adopted, starting with a literature review of different types of roadmaps and their suitability to support the desired improvement objectives. Layers and processes were thus developed using the key issues identified in three recent research streams, and the roadmap was structured. Findings The major findings have been captured within a three-layer, four-step process generic roadmap for improving the resilience and sustainability of health and social care facilities that can be used to monitor performance, plans future actions and implement response to change. Practical implications This paper targets decision makers, especially estate managers, but the proposed layers and processes can be modified for other stakeholders. Originality/value This paper suggests an original approach for the development of a roadmap for resilience and sustainability of health and social care facilities, and specifically of how to structure layers and processes, envisioning a more integrated development of service provision and infrastructure asset management.

Panwar, A, Tripathi, K K and Jha, K N (2019) A qualitative framework for selection of optimization algorithm for multi-objective trade-off problem in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 1924–45.

Roberts, C, Edwards, D J, Hosseini, M R, Mateo-Garcia, M and Owusu-Manu, D (2019) Post-occupancy evaluation: a review of literature. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2084–106.

Wu, C, Chen, C, Jiang, R, Wu, P, Xu, B and Wang, J (2019) Understanding laborers’ behavioral diversities in multinational construction projects using integrated simulation approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(09), 2120–46.